Jun 162017
 

How Good Is It?

Even at its outset, the Bond series had a tension between espionage action and comedy. While Dr. No falls squarely on the espionage action side, actually taking time to show Bond checking his room for bugs and checking to see if it was tampered with, the comedy still shows up a bit in the form of Bond’s one-liners and goofy stuff like the “dragon”.

As a film Dr. No is kind of a shambles. The villain himself shows up very late and does little that makes any sense. The choice to make No an agent of SPECTRE rather than the Russians (as he is in the book) makes the rocket-misdirection point nonsensical. The extended episode of Bond, Ryder, and Quarrel dodging soldiers on Crab Key feels like a waste of time.

While Bond is on Jamaica the film is much more interesting, although the conspirators there never seem even potentially a match for Bond. They also engage in the series’ first needlessly complicated murder attempt: if you can get close enough to slip a tarantula into a man’s bed you can get close enough to just shoot him. Nonetheless the conspirators come across as a mostly competent bunch who are willing to die for their cause. Unfortunately the titular villain himself seems unequal to this radical devotion.

Dr. No was made on a relatively skinny budget and it shows. The “aquarium” is a special effects fail so terrible that the script actually had to be changed to deal with it. The fact that Connery has a pane of glass between him and the tarantula is painfully obvious (when the spider is on a human it’s an uncredited stuntman). A mid-movie car chase has poorly-scaled projection that makes the in-car shots look needlessly goofy. Also, the nuclear reactor in the climactic scene operates backwards (somehow becoming hotter as control rods are inserted).

Ultimately Dr. No is one of the weaker entries in the series. It’s not outright bad, but the villain is weak, the plot is scattered, and it builds tension poorly. It’s worth viewing as a curiosity but not really worth seeking out.

How Gross Is It?

The Bond films include a lot of sexual politics that seemed outdated even at the time of their filming, so people who want to explore the older ones for fun should be ready for some unpleasantness. Dr. No’s worst sin is that the title character (and most Asian characters in the film) is a white person in yellowface.

The sexual politics are less terrible than some subsequent films: Sylvia Trench, despite being on the receiving end of Bond’s almost sneering introduction, gets the better of him, and Miss Taro at least has some agency. Honey Ryder is there mostly to look good in a bikini (she does) and is largely useless. Considering the era and Bond’s intrinsic nature it’s not particularly disturbing stuff.

How’s The Song?

As the first film in the series, Dr. No predates the tradition of having a title song. The James Bond Theme instead segues into calypso music accompanied by colorful dancing silhouettes. The concept of the stylized introductory sequence would be used in most of the subsequent films, and in some instances is the best part of the movie.

As for the James Bond Theme itself, one of the reasons it’s iconic is that it perfectly suits the series. Its opening riff plays towards the idea of intrigue, but then it turns towards a bombastic, almost comedic swing routine and tops it off with a great action-catastrophe cue. That covers pretty much everything about the character as he existed up until the Craig years.

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)